Friday 29 June 2012

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EDUCATION SYSTEM IN INDIA AND USA


                                                                                         
                                                                                 -Dr. S. Vijay Kumar
          
In this article, I haved tried to explain the similarities and differences in the education system of India and USA. While, there are some similarities, there are also some significant differences too between the two education systems. It would be difficult for me to mention here in detail regarding all the differences, but I will try to highlight a few key differences that would turn the attention of the academicians, teachers, students and policy makers towards the best practices adopted by USA in its education system.  

Similarities in Education System of India and USA:
·        Structured Curriculum / Syllabus
·        Reasonably qualified teachers
·        Concept of Private, Public schools/Colleges and Universities
·   A willingness on the part of children and parents to get the proper education
·       There are different standards throughout both the countries; each state determines the curriculum/syllabus and different types of examinations.

Differences in Educaton System of India and USA:

Indian Education System:
The official public school system starts with Primary School. A child has to complete 5 years to go to Primary School (1st Class to 5th Class).  After primary school, child has to go to Upper Primary & Secondary School (6th to 10th). After Secondary School (SSC), the students go to Junior College (1st & 2nd Year Intermediate i.e. 11th and 12th). After Junior College, students go to Degree College (3 Years), PG (2 Years), Ph.D and Post Doctoral. 

Unlike US, students in India chose their Courses not by interest, but on the basis of job opportunities available in the market. For example, if there are more job prospects in the computer field, most of them run for computer courses, burying their interest which they had in other subjects. Thus, people in India have to suppress their interests or develop them personally on their own. More over, in India in most of the Universities/ Colleges there are no Campus jobs. 

American education system:
The official public school system starts with Kindergarten. In most states, a child has to complete 5 years to go to Kindergarten. After Kindergarten, child has to go 1st grade, then 2nd grade and so on until 12th grade. Some public schools offer a Pre-Kindergarten as well. This is not a formal education level. In some schools, Pre-Kindergarten is meant for poor children, homeless kids, kids who cannot speak English etc. The pre-kindergarten is generally meant to prepare the backward children to get ready for formal education next year. After 12th grade, UG (4 years), MS (PG - 2 Years), Ph.D and Post- Doctoral.

On the contrary to India, in US no one would say that I am interested only in a particular Course. Generally all people have some interests in different areas like music, dance, physics, economics, history, geography, psychology, philosophy, astronomy, etc. In US, they can take a few courses in the areas in which they are  interested – which facilitates "learning what you want to". All people would not run behind a few particular courses. Unlike this, in India most of the people are mad of doing a few particular courses like medicine or engineering. In US, bright people are spread out in different majors (Courses) and brightness is rooted in interest and not as a necessity. In the US, effort is made to make a course easy to the student i.e. student concerns are taken into account while designing the course, because of the philosophy of not to unnecessary trouble a person. This might lead to easier undergraduate courses. Since they have choice of course selections atleast as early as the 9th grade - so many people don't take all fundamental courses - some people avoid courses they hate like maths, geography etc. This is a demerit in US education system.

More social activities on campus - more parties, more clubs (want to fly a plane? join the flying club at University Campus), more facilities like the Gym, having friendships with people in different majors (major field of study) giving a broader perspective of life in general, opportunity to participate in totally different activities like writing for the college student newspaper, etc. All these develop a better well rounded individual. The quality of life in general in the US is high and there are lots of facilities and infrastructure for the people who really wants to learn.
 
Gender Gap in Certain Courses (Majors):
In US, according to a source: blogs.payscale.com and Ask Dr.Salaryblog by Katie Bardaro there exists a big gender gap for certain majors. It further expresses the doubt that ‘Is it really a bias or the bias due to future pay’. Some courses are chosen for study keeping in fiew of the future pay, while in case of certain other courses there is a bias towards men or women for various reasons. Here, I give some examples:

Fashion design stands as the most gender-stratified college major these days — quite a shock for anyone who mentally gravitates toward the STEM fields (some of the best-paying and have the greatest potential for job) whenever the subject pops up. A staggering 95% of the discipline is made up of females, while men make up 93% of construction management degree programs, making it the most male-dominated major these days.  According to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the few women who pick the college and career path tend toward medical and energy applications. Though they slowly seem to seep into mechanical engineering, 92% of majors are still of the masculine persuasion, and even within the industry everything stays rather gendered. Ninety-one percent of electrical engineering degrees wind up in the hands of men, owing to the history of being painted as an inherently “masculine” pursuit.

Interior Design Course much like fashion design, the home-and-business-decorating degree plans remain almost the exclusive domain of women — to the point that academic inquiries have been launched on the topic. Once again, rampant homophobia ruins it for men hoping to pursue such careers, meaning ladies make up 90% of interior design majors. 91% Physics degrees are conferred to men, and The American Physical Society (as well as similar institutions) continuously searches for sustainable solutions encouraging women to enter into the discipline. With regard to Social Work and Nursing Course, men rarely sign up to major in either subject, leaving women to dominate at 88%. Aerospace Engineering  entertains the male demographic, claiming 87% of the majors like most of the other engineering disciplines largely entertains a history of limiting gender stereotypes (which cut both ways, obviously) roadblock women from entering into fields they might otherwise consider. 86% of female opot for Occupational Therapy. Civil engineering and Computer science, each dominated by 85% male. Thus, majority of Majors (main field of study)/ Courses are male biased.   

 Sex Education in US and India:

Almost all students in the U.S. receive some form of sex education at least once between grades 7 and 12; many schools begin addressing some topics as early as grades 4 or 5. However, what students learn varies widely, because curriculum decisions are so decentralized. Many states have laws governing what is taught in sex education classes or allowing parents to opt out. Some state laws leave curriculum decisions to individual school districts. Most U.S. sex education courses in grades 7 through 12 cover puberty, HIV, STDs, abstinence, implications of teenage pregnancy and how to resist peer pressure. Other studied topics, such as methods of birth control and infection prevention, sexual orientation, sexual abuse, and factual and ethical information about abortion. In India, sex education is not imparted in schools and colleges.
Public Schools in USA and India:
In most states in USA, government offers free education to children through public schools operated by government. There is no fee in such schools. Schools are funded by the government through the taxes collected by   federal/state/county/city governments. A significant portion of the taxes from residents goes to the school/education fund. Unlike the government schools in India, the public schools in USA are well maintained and managed. Most schools get a lot of government fund and so provide great infrastructure. There are several educational programs organized and funded by various educational boards for the benefit of the children. Academic programs for each school are defined by the state board of the respective states.
Public schools are free in both USA and India. However, the Indian government schools are not preferred schools for most people due to the lack of infrastructure and committed management. Most government schools in India have poor infrastructure and facilities. Teachers are usually qualified, but since only children with poor academic background and family background choose government schools in India, teachers eventually lose interest.
Private schools in USA and India:
There are several private schools in USA, which offer a similar education like public schools. Private schools require heavy fees from students to meet the huge expenses in running the school. However, in many cases, private schools cannot compete with the infrastructure and programs offered by public schools in USA. There are several well known private schools in USA which are very famous and attract the cream layer of the talented students.

Private schools are chosen by parents for many reasons:
1. Social status: Some parents choose posh private schools to show their social status.
2. Racial reasons: Some parents may not like their kids to go to certain public schools due to racial reasons. This may or may not be for racial discrimination or could be other social reasons.
3. Public school may not be good: Kids can go to only designated public school and they cannot choose which public school they can go. For some reasons, if the parents/children do not like their public school, their options are limited to going to a private school of their choice.
4. Academic standard: In some areas, public schools may not offer good education or the infrastructure of the building may be poor. In such cases, parent would choose private schools.
5. Convenience: If public schools are too far and there are private schools at very convenient location (like near the work place of parents), they would choose private schools.
6. Religious Education: Lot of parents wants to give religious education to their children. There are hundreds of Christian schools in USA, which focus on Christian as well as value based education. In general, such religious schools offer relatively low fees.

Home schooling in USA Vs India:

This is another form of common education system in USA. As the name says, in this form of education, kids will not go to any school. Rather, a parent or a tuition teacher will teach the students at home itself. There is no formal timetable, but in most cases, parents would define a timetable for the kids at home schooling. In home schooling, parents can teach the kids at the pace they want and they can. They can give individual focus to the needs of their children. In case of super smart kids, they can teach a lot and cover a lot of syllabus than the formal school. In case of children who need special attention and care, they can go at a slow speed giving proper care to the needs of the child. Most parents purchase educational material, books and syllabus and follow the formal process at home. One of the main disadvantages of homeschooling in USA is, kids will lack social skills. They do not get many opportunities to interact with other kids. To overcome this problem, parents will form groups with other parents involved in home schooling and then arrange group discussions and activities at scheduled time in various locations like public libraries and parks.
Stress on the students in India and the flexibility of the American Education System:
The basic and most important difference between the two educational systems is the stress on the students in India at the primary and high school level itself. The Indian education and social systems are very hard on kids and completely ignore their feelings, opinions and ambitions. Kids are pushed to study from the age of 3 and non-performers are treated as dolts and ostracized by parents and society. The preferred choice of learning and teaching is memorizing. The memorization approach to study does not allow and teach kids to think independently. On the other hand, the flexibility of the American education system is its greatest strength. Students can choose among a host of classes and courses in high school and college. This means they can change their major (i.e. field of study) midway through college. This usually means that students in the US receive more exposure to a variety of subjects and hence, are more aware of their career options and opportunities. The American school system lays stress on individual ability development and encourages kids to express themselves and their opinions from an early age. As a result, most Americans are way better at getting their point across as compared to people from other countries. 

Students in the US who are more out-spoken, when compared to students in India:
Students in the US who are more out-spoken do well in class and outside class too only because they are more effective speakers. In the Indian system, individuals’ speaking is only done with the teacher one-on-one during "oral" examinations, where students are asked questions on the subject matter. While students in the US build more self-confidence and are much better at public speaking. Classroom discussion and asking questions to the professors is encouraged. Indian students on the other hand find it hard to learn to speak up or express their opinions. Professors expect to treat them like God and often use their almost dictorial powers against students who upset them in some way. 

American education system is designed not to reduce/hurt the self-esteem of any kid, when compared to India:
American education (high school and college) system is designed so as not to reduce/hurt the self-esteem of any kid in class. It is designed in such a way that nearly everyone can pass the high-school level. On the other hand, most Indian children fear failure in each class.

Trained/Certified teachers:
In India it is very common for teachers at all level (primary through high school) to have obtained their undergraduate degree. In addition, teachers needed to be specifically trained in a particular teaching training programme i.e. by joining Teaching Training Course (TTC) or Bachelor of Education (B.Ed) after passing entrance test for the concerned course. In the United States, according to the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) which went into effect during 2002-03, teachers who teach core academic subjects are required to be “highly qualified.” The law defines a highly qualified teacher as an individual who:
·        Has obtained full state certification;
·        Holds a license to teach in the state;
· Has not had certification or licensure requirements waived on an emergency,temporary or provisional basis.
·  In addition, there are requirements for demonstrating subject-matter knowledge that varies depending on what grade level an individual is teaching, and whether he/she is new to teaching or is a veteran teacher.

The "highly qualified" teacher requirements do not apply to all individuals, such as supplemental service providers and charter school teachers, who teach public school students.  It is common that para-professionals are not being provided with the range of options necessary to demonstrate that they are qualified, nor the financial support necessary to meet the requirements. Often in private school settings, teachers are exempt from needing to be fully licensed or are given a few years leeway to obtain their license. Therefore, there is a vast difference in being “highly qualified” in India, than in the United States.

Role of the Family, Teachers and Society:
Indian families take education very seriously and believe that a solid education is the key to success in life. While many American families certainly share the same sentiments.  But, the American education system is designed according to maintaining students’ high self-esteem. Therefore, nearly everyone in the class will pass so long as ‘feelings’ aren’t hurt and the teacher is not looked upon as doing an inefficient job in his/her classroom; regardless of what the actual students’ proficiency levels are in that subject area. Instead of pushing the students harder to achieve beyond their current potential, teachers often “dumb down” the subject material to ensure that students’ grades remain high. On the other hand, most Indian children have the fear of failure in the classroom and push themselves to work harder and longer by being self-motivated. This is also true of their parents and teachers, as school administrators pride themselves on being able to recruit new batches of students based on the academic achievements of outgoing classes.

Mathematics:
Mathematics develops logical and rational thinking; it lays the foundation of independent and lateral thinking. Indian schools start teaching maths, like multiplication tables, at the elementary level itself. It is given a lot of importance and is a must for students who plan to do science related study in college. On the other hand, high school in America is so flexible that a lot of students who end up majoring in sciences in college do not take advanced maths and calculus in high school. This emphasis on maths in high schools and engineering programs is also the reason why India produces so many "good" software engineers. This is one of the main reasons why most of the graduate students in computer science in the US are foriegn students.

Curriculum:
Indian education curriculum, for example, the curriculum for clas IX, in India, builds on the things a student learned in clas VIII. This is not necessarily true in the US curriculum. In US, for class they say grade.

Extra-curricular activities:
 In America, parents and school systems place a strong emphasis on extra-curricular activities and pour vast amounts of funding and resources into giving their children and students the best experiences in athletics, fine arts and social clubs. While these extra-curricular activities are necessary, however, in India, the focus remains on academics, as Indian parents, teachers and administrators realize that it is by getting good grades and high scores on tests, that children will go on to becoming successful adults. Instead of investing in private athletic coaches or additional gym time, Indian parents place the priority on investing in tutors to accelerate their child’s learning. Tutors are used to help their children excel in a subject area, not just for remedial work.

College Education System:
The American college education system is industry-oriented and hence, is structured so that it produces people who can do a certain type of job efficiently. So it is like a custom-design factory which produces engineers/workers who can do one or two jobs very well but require massive retraining if they have to do something new. In contrast, the education in India is more towards teaching the basic concepts and a broader mass of information. The products of this education system are therefore capable of taking up several different types of jobs and are not masters of any single job. To do any single job well, they have to go through some amount of training at work.  In USA, students are always being told to read something, do some assignment and essentially, being given goal-oriented tasks to perform, works great when students are being trained to work in the industry. And this is an admirable goal - America is built on the strength of these students who can perform what they have been told to do. However, in the long run, these people are not able to adapt quickly to changes in the industry. And they are definitely not prepared to go to graduate school i.e for a master's or a Ph.D.
Graduate school is very different from undergraduate school. There is no single book being followed; the reading and writing assignments require paper chases and are ambiguously defined. Also, most courses do not have regular evaluations such as quizes etc. but rely on a final project or term paper - this makes it very hard for one to know how much effort one needs to put into the course. One has to come out of the "spoonfeed me" mode and learn to think independently. This lack of spoonfeeding in graduate school also means that one has to be motivated by themselves - especially in PhD programs. The amount that you get out of your master's or PhD depends on the amount of work you put in (more work also means faster graduation). There is no one motivating you to work harder or checking on your progress regularly. This is the situation described for public universities in the US. But, private liberal arts universities provide much better personalized attention to students besides a broader education. Also, non-science programs are stronger in general in the US due to the fact that they follow regular quarter or semester systems. In India, on the other hand, though semester system is prevailing most of the university students waste their whole year doing nothing; attendence requirements are very low and usually can be bypassed.  

To conclude, the flexibility of U.S education system is its greatest strength. The flexibility allows the students to know better of themselves regarding their talent, capabilities and interest, which is hard to find in Indian education system. Thus, US education system is freedom oriented (learn what you want to), and Indian system is forced (you gotta learn this). In India, all the decisions are taken by parents and they are not allowed to think independently. If flexibility is not allowed “Our education produces slaves, but American education produces Inventors.” We need to promote the 'creativity' in Indian education. Graduate programs in the US are far ahead of most other countries due to the critical mass they have and the fact that they attract the best students and faculty from all over the world. In spite of many good things in US education system, one must be careful regarding the youth are being more obsessed towards sex, alcohol, drugs, violence, etc. in USA, because India is taking up western culture very fast and once this culture occupy India, it will not take much time to ruine our education and culture.Bottom of Form











Sunday 24 June 2012

Contents of the book: Asian Economic Review















Asian Economic Review, (1990) VOLUME 32, Issue 1 

CONTENTS:
639   Economic Stagnation in Papua New guinea, Manner, H.G, p. 1
640   Demographic Trends and the Impact of Family Welfare Programmes in India,
N. Lingamurthy and S. Vijay Kumar p. 45.
641   Accountability in Indian Education: Conceptual Framework and Issues, Prahlad, Kumar, p. 77
642   Determinants of FDI in Pacific -- Rim Developing Countries, Agarwal, J.P. p. 83.
643   Agricultural Development in Kerala from 1800 AD to 1956 AD: A Bibilography Eassy, Prakash, B.A, p. 101.
644   Size of Farm, Intensity of Land Use and Irrigation in (Sindh) Pakistan, Wasim, Mohammad Pervez, p. 129.
645   Tenure-Size Relationship with Productivity in Pakistan Agriculture: A Case Study of Newabshah Sind, Ahmed, Qazi Massod, p. 153.

Contents of the book:Towards Gender Equality : India's Experience


Towards Gender Equality : India's Experience/edited by N. Linga Murthy, T. Jyothi Rani, G. Rajaiah, K.V. Narayana, Mohd. Iqbal Ali and T. Papi Reddy
 Serials Pub, 2007, xliv, 506 p, tables, ISBN : 8183870848, $60.00









 
Contents: Preface. Keynote address. I. Women's status: 1. Impact of women in governance in BIMSTEC--changes and dynamics in the political policy/B. Ratna Kumari and A. Rajani. 2. Violence against women - a study in Khammam District of A.P.S. Radhakrishna and K. Madhava Rao. 3. Role of women: a study of rural women headed households/G. Satyanarayana, M. Reddi Ramu and K. Krishna Reddy. 4.The status of Dalit women in rural areas in the post-independent India/M. Erragattu Swamy and M. Ashok Kumar. 5. Practical utility of gender study/N.M. Das and S. Vidya Sagar. 6. Status of tribal women: some issues and concerns/P. Sammulal, A Hari Prasad and P. Ramlal. 7. Muslim women in India-problems and prospects/N.T.K. Naik, S. Mansoor Rahman and H. Akther Banu. 8. Agrarian distress, farmers' suicides and gender vulnerability/E. Revathi and Burra Ramulu. II. Women's education: 9. Women's education as an unfinished agenda--India's experience/T. Jyothi Rani and K. Katyayani. 10. Women vis-a-vis higher education: an analytical note/C. Sivaramakrishna Rao, N. Linga Murthy and K. Mohan Reddy. 11. Education of girls in India/M. Rukmini, C.V. Naidu and S. Rathna Kumari. 12. Gender disparities in education and employment/S. Vidya Sagar and K. Manuja Devi. 13. Analysis of gender inequalities in literacy rate -- a study in A.P./Gulam Rabbani and Kunati Raji Reddy. 14. Girls' education in India- a development imperative/P. Vijayalakshmi Pandit. 15. Promoting gender equality through education in the Indian context/Mohamed Khaiser Ahmed. 16. Adolescents and family life education--a study of college girls/V. Sreedevi and D. Usha Rani. 17. Gender inequality in literacy rates and education in India/D. Pulla Rao. III. Women's employments: 18. Gender-wise labour absorption in agriculture--an empirical analysis/G. Mallikarjun, Mohd. Iqbal Ali and T. Papi Reddy. 19. Empowerment of women through employment--a review/K. Padma Latha. 20. Gender disparities in workforce participation rates--a study in Andhra Pradesh/Gulam Rabbani and M. Ramesh Reddy. 21. Impact of the SHGs on livelihoods, income and household assets: a study in Karnataka/G. Sreedhar. 22. Gender equality through women entrepreneurship-a research perspective/Sita Vanka and N. Linga Murthy. 23. Gender discrimination in agricultural wages: a case study in Kurnool District of Andhra Pradesh/I. Narendra Kumar, V.K. Reddy and G. Chandrasekar Rao. 24. Gender inequalities among marginal farmer and agricultural labourer households--a study of two villages in Khammam District/A. Venkateswarlu and Y. Venkateswara Rao. 25. Gender issue in watershed programmes-a study/K. Ramanuja Rao and Manduva Narasimha Rao. 26. Working women in the organised industrial sector/C. Swarajyalakshmi. 27. Role of micro finance and changing socio-economic conditions of women/K. Harathi. IV. Women's health: 28. Prevalence of chronic energy deficiency and obesity among rural women-an analysis of nutrient intakes in relation to Plane to nutrition/D.L. Kusuma and B. Babitha. 29. Menarche and related problems--a comparative study of inter and degree students/D. Usha Rani and V. Sreedevi. 30. Nutritional status and dietary profile of married pregnant adolescent girls and young women/Baby Depur and G. Nagamani. 31. Mainstreaming gender in health, nutrition and population stabilization/Padma. V. Gender equality: 32. Empowerment of women and moving towards equality--some conceptual issues/C. Sivaramakrishna Rao, N. Linga Murthy and K. Mohan Reddy. 33. Gender equality: new opportunities for moving ahead/B. Ratna Kumari, Tara Kumari and A. Rajani. 34. Discrimination against girl child: a study of two villages in Guntur District/D. Srilatha and B. Sambasiva Rao. 35. Declining child sex ratio in Andhra Pradesh: causes and consequences/A. Rajani. 36. Gender related development index and gender empowerment measure in India and ASEAN region--a comparative study/P. Tara Kumari and P. Vijaya Prakash. 37. Progress of gender equality--a study of the SAARC Region/P. Leela. 38. Gender discrimination in domestic sphere and place of work-a study/M. Pushpa Latha and B. Sudhakar. 39. Gender equality through empowerment of women in India/S. Vijaya Kumar. 40. Gender discrimination in India/K. Narasimhulu. 41. Gender inequality: in retrospect and prospect/V.V. Reddy and G. Bhaskar. 42. Women and law: towards gender justice/Vijaya Chandra Tenneti and T. Yadagiri Rao. 43. Gender dimensions among Adivasis of Eastern Ghats (Sharing the experience of Jana Chetana, an NGO)/M. Sankara Reddi, M. Chandrayya and M. Sundara Rao. 44. Women empowerment- a socio-legal approach/K. Sudhakar and M. Ravinder.
"Economic development is expected to show a positive impact on women's control over resources and their participation in decision-making and this has initiated great interest in empowerment studies. Researchers, policy makers, feminist scholars activists, administrators, politicians, bureaucrats, sociologists, economists, anthropologists, intellectuals, Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs) and international institutions, such as the United Nations, etc., have been examining the impact of development on the status of women in general and developing countries in particular. Many of them are inspired by Easter Boserup's path breaking study on "Women's Role in Economic Development" published in the year 1970. Most of the studies conducted by them address the problems of gender discrimination that is beset with the process of development. In the light of this backdrop, the collection of essays in this volume made an attempt to examine the national polices and ideologies which often declared their commitment towards the attainment of gender equality. Though, this book does not seek to offer a definition or meaning of empowerment that will be effective and applicable globally, it speaks about the approach to "Moving towards Gender Equality" at the national and regional levels and further this volume tries to highlight the different implications of empowerment of women in the specific context of development and social change. This volume is divided into five sections." (jacket)

Contents of the book: WTO, Globalization and Indian Agriculture


           
Table of Contents

1.WTO and Indian Agriculture - G. Bhaskar
2. Indian Agriculture in the Context of Globalization - S. Vijay Kumar
3. GATT, WTO and Challenges to Indian Agriculture - M. Sundara Rao and D. Venkata Rao
4. Women Participation in Indian Agriculture - K. Harathi and B. Deepthi Nanada
5. Globalization and the Changing Role of Women in Agriculture - P. Mercy Kumari, K. Mahendra Kumar and B.S. Rao
6. Some Reflections on Globalization and Indian Agriculture - G. Mallikarjun and Mohd. Iqbal Ali
7. Global Perspective of Indian Agriculture - N.T.K. Naik, G. Rama Krishna and K. Chinna Venkata Swamy
8. Economic Reforms and Indian Agriculture - K. Mohan Reddy, M. Vara Prasad and K. Ugandhar
9. WTO, Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), and Agriculture - Gajavelli V S and Sohil Vakharia
10. Agriculture in India: Impact of Globalization - Pulla Srinivas, B Netajee and M Narasimharao
11. Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and Indian Agriculture - P. Sambaiah

Appendix: Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-12) on Agriculture and Allied Activities